THE RIGHTS OF THE ONE

Theodore Wagner

Every day I see another case of the courts conspiring against the rights of the singer person in the Ninth Amendment. Why do the people not come together to defend our Constitution from oppression?                                                              The Ninth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny of disparage other retained by the people.” 

The right of the one people is protected in the Ninth Amendment. Until the people understand the courts do NOT have the authority they are using they will continue to abuse their power! 

THOU SHALL NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS!

“Thou shall bear fall witness against thy nabor.” is the Ninth Commandment of GOD. This commandment is the reason we had the oath in court, “Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, So help you GOD.”

The Ninth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny of disparage other retained by the people.”   I ,Theodore Wagner retain the unalienable right endowed on me by GOD to have the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth spoken about me, most especially, by my own government. I can prove the government through SA. Cynthia McCants and Det. William Crews did knowingly and intentionally bear false witness against me under oath to GOD. I can prove the court knew this, and did aid in and did facilitate a cover up by using Laws made by Congress to oppress redress of my challenge.

This is one of the challenges I have before the court right now the court refuses to address titled “I challenge the court’s authority to oppress the Commanded Protection of the Ninth Amendment and petition for a test as presented in U.S.A. vs. Butler, 297 US 1.”  It is a constitutionally protected right that my government will not bear false witness against me. I have, as all Americans have, the right to grieve by petition in court that my government did bear false witness. That they did produce a false stigma that is causing my harm. There is no way the government or anyone can say there is not an ongoing harm and damage that permanently affects a person’s life by false stigma.

To those of us who have not given our Souls to the Evil ONE, these truths are self-evident: that all persons are created equal, that we are all endowed by OUR CREATOR with certain unalienable rights, that among these, but not limited to, are Life, Liberty, and, the personal pursuit of happiness. Among these certain unalienable rights endowed on us by Our Creator, are those commanded protections of the Ten Commandments of The Creator.

Just because a person, or Regime, has closed their hearts off from The Creator, or given their soul to the Evil ONE as to refuse to swear the Oath “SO HELP ME GOD”, does not Void the Unalienable Right I retain through the Ninth Amendment to have the Truth, the whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth presented about me.

The courts have ruled in the last few years that the government has the right to bear false witness and the courts protect prosecutors who do so.

1.   See: The Advocate: USA Today - Justice in the Balance

advocateky.blogspot.com/2011/08/usa-today-justice-in-balance.html‎

o Cached

o Share

View shared post

Aug 20, 2011 – A USA TODAY investigation documented 201 criminal cases across the nation in which federal judges found that prosecutors broke the rule

This is only samples of what I am trying to end. Prosecutors will continue to conspire against constitutional rights until this challenge is heard. Please help me end this oppression. I need your help!

JUDGES ARE NOT PROTECTED!

                Judges are not protected from oppression of Constitutional rights. I had someone again tell me that judges cannot be sued. It is the judges using sophistry who say they cannot be sued. They base this on the King’s Law where whatever a representative of the King did as the Supreme Power was the Supreme Law of the Land and he is immune and cannot be held accountable. What they leave out is that even under the King’s Law when a representative of the King went beyond the authority given to them by the King he could be held accountable and you could sue him.

                In America, The Supreme Law of the Land is the U.S. Constitution. A judge takes an oath to defend the integrity of the Supreme Law as presented below. When a judge goes beyond the power and authority invested in him by the Constitution he loses his immunity and can be sued. That is one of the safeties of the Constitution to protect the people from judges being able to protect the government misuse of power. When a judge puts himself above the Supreme Law of the Land and willing to use GOD’S name in vain to protect the government’s oppression of the Constitution he has lost all immunity just as if he had conspired against the King.

                This is one of the points I am trying to restore to the safeties of the Constitution. As long as the people turn a blind eye to the oppression of the integrity of the Constitution and the safeties in it that protect us the government will continue to erode our great Constitution. Judges are not immune when they use their power to oppress the Constitution.

               

                ARTICLE Vl, CLAUSE 2, SUPREME LAW.

                This Constitution, and the Laws of the United states which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, and any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

                ARTICLE Vl, CLAUSE 3, OATH OF OFFICE.

                The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Offices, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Admiration, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any office of public Trust under the United States.

                5 USC § 3331   Oath of office

                An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath; I,AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

                28 USC § 453    Oaths of justices and judges

                Each justice of judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ---, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as --- under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

                Federal courts cannot countenance deliberate violations of basic constitutional rights. To do so would violate their judicial oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. 28 U.S.C.S § 453 (1976)

Contoversy

       It would seem that even when the presentation would be considered controversial no one cares about their unalienable rights. I have approached a number of people since yesterday and told them of yesterdays post. They had an opinion but still did not want to get involved. What will it take for people to stand up for their right of redress? Any ideas.

NIGER! DON'T DRINK THAT WATER!

                Thank GOD for the Right of Redress in the FIRST AMENDMENT that protected the Right of the People to challenge the EVIL of the Government’s right to make a Law that says one group of people was less than human. If it were not for the right of the people peaceably to petition the government for a redress of grievances and those brave enough to stand up to an evil law that said one group of people were not allowed to drink from the same place as a white man this evil might still exist.

                Last night I was trying to find someone to sign my petition to demand the court give redress to my challenge of Laws made in violation of the First Amendment command “Congress shall make NO LAW respecting…the right of the people peaceably…to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” A black man told me that I should let it go. That if the government makes a law, it the law and you have to obey it. If it had not been for the right of Redress and the brave people who stood up to the oppression of the equal rights of the oppressed then we would still have that evil today. The government has made laws that give the government the right to bear false witness against me and deny me the right to grieve it.

                President Bush made laws that make it unlawful to challenge the telecommunication companies from conspiring to violate the fourth Amendment with unlawful wire tapping, “FISA Amendments Act of 2008”.  President Clinton made the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that gave the court’s the power to oppress and deny the Privilege of Habeas Corpus, a constitutionally protected right. There is literally hundreds of Law made by Congress made in violation of First Amendment mandate I have invoked in my challenge.

The US Constitution is the Laws of the United States which shall be make in Pursuance thereof, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land: and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby.

                Every judge takes two oaths, and to defend the integrity of the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic;…that ends “So help me God.”  They bind their soul and their HONOR to their oath to defend the integrity of the Constitution.

                The fifth mandate of the FIRST AMENDMENT is a command that is clear and unambiguous.

“Congress shall make no law respecting…the right of the people peaceably…to petition the government FOR A RESRESS of grievances.”

                I have repeatedly made a Lawful challenge of several laws used to oppress the grievance process under USA v. Butler, 297 us 1 which states,                                                                                                “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. All legislation must conform to the principles it lays down. When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty, -to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former. All the court does, of can do, is to announce its considered judgment upon the question.”

As judges they know Marbury v. Madison, 5 us 137.

“The oath of office, too, imposed by the legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words: “I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as, according to the best of my abilities and understanding agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States.”

Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United Stated, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?

If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery, To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.

It is also not entirely unworthy of observation, that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the constitution, have that rank.

Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United Stated confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”

I repeatedly challenge Laws that are repugnant of this First Amendment mandate only to have them and all persons in government refuse to HONOR their oath to defend the integrity of the Constitution. Judge Joseph R. McCorey, Email: mccrorey_ecf@scd.uscourts.gov and George Ross Anderson, Jr, Email: ganderson_ecf@scf@scd.uscourts.gov both refuse to HONOR their oath and give redress to this challenge. They would rather conspire against GOD and Country to facilitate the ongoing oppression of the Constitution than give a Full and Fair Redress on the record as their duty would require.

I have made this challenge over and over. The courts have repeatedly called this challenge an objection or use other forms of sophistry to obfuscate the challenge. Butler is clear that the court has only one duty. To lay the FIRST AMENDMENT mandate I have invoked above next to the FISA Amendment Act, the FTCA, the AEDPA, and all other laws made by congress respecting the right of the people to peaceably to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This challenge will VOID all laws made by Congress to oppress redress. Please help me compel the courts to answer this challenge. I welcome all adversaries of the U.S. Constitution to challenge this argument. I need all those who believe in the integrity of the Constitution to help me. We can restore this right!

 Please sign my petition:"The oppression of the RIGHT OF REDRESS in the FIRST AMENDMENT: A Full and Fair Redress on the record of challenge of Laws " on Change.org.

It's important. Will you sign it too? Here's the link:http://www.change.org/petitions/the-oppession-of-the-right-of-redress-in-the-first-amendment-a-full-and-fair-redress-on-the-record-of-challenge-of-laws?share_id=aGeIHISkma&utm_campaign=signature_receipt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition

I welcome all comments of those who believe that government should have the right to oppress the rights of the people and the people should have the right for a full and fair redress on the record.

You Have No Rights!

    Today I was trying to get someone interested in the First Amendment. He argued that the Constitution is nothing more than a prop. He kept repeating that "You don't have any rights!" I kept saying, " It is because people like you don't have the balls to stand up for your rights! " He said the courts will do what they want and there is nothing I can do about it. He is wrong. Sooner or later I will find one person who believes in the integrity of the Constitution. Then we will find four. In the end they will answer the question. No doubt!

Scared to confront the government?

   I am very disturbed that everyone seams to be scared to confront the government's unconstitutional use of power. I will never give up the quest to restore the right to a full and fair redress. I need to find some other people who believe in the U.S. Constitution.

Giving up your liberty

   "THEY WHO CAN GIVE UP ESSENTIAL LIBERTY TO OBTAIN A LITTLE TEMPORARY SAFETY,DESERVES NEITHER LIBERTY NOR SAFETY."  Benjamin Franklin

   The right to challenge government oppression is one of the most important rights we can have. That is why our founding fathers placed it in the first Amendment with a command to Congress that "Congress Shall Make No Law Respecting" the right of redress.

    Why are the people willing to give up this right? The government are unconstitutionally tapping your phones without a warrant and made a law that says you can't grieve it. My challenge will restore the right to a full and fair redress of our grievances. The Constitution needs your help!

Let every violation of the Constitution be reprehended

Precedents are dangerous things; let the reins of government then be braced and held with a steady hand, and every violation of the Constitution be reprehended: if defective, let it be amended, but not suffered to be trampled upon whilst it has an existence.  "George Washington"

    Judge McCrorey and Judge Anderson violate their oath to GOD every time they trample on the IDEALS of the Constitution and egnor my lawful challenge of the laws they are using to oppress the truth. But it also looks like the people are willing to let it happen. Go to  //wh.gov/JgyP to help stop the oppress of the FIRST AMMENDMENT.

Judge McCrorey conspires to oppress lawful challenge

                I just sent a copy of the Email I have been sending out today to Judge Joseph R. McCrorey at mccrorey_ecf@scd.uscourts.gov and to Judge George Ross Anderson, Jr at ganderson_ecf@scd.uscourts.gov   . As they have been complicit in oppressing this FIRST AMMENDMENT challenge as presented in USA v Butler, 297 us 1 from the beginning it is clear they do not care about their oath to GOD in 5 usc -3331 or their oath to defend the US Constitution. The Butler supra is clear.

“The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. All legislation must conform to the principles it lays down. When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty, -to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former. All the court does, of can do, is to announce its considered judgment upon the question.”

As judges they know Marbury v. Madison, 5 us 137.

“The oath of office, too, imposed by the legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words: “I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as, according to the best of my abilities and understanding agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States.”

Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United Stated, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?

If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery, To prescribe, of to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.

It is also not entirely unworthy of observation, that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the constitution, have that rank.

Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United Stated confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”

It is clear that Judge McCororey and Judge Anderson as well as all who have seen my challenge and turn a blind eye are complicit or enabling the facilitation of this conspiracy. The fifth mandate I invoked is unambiguous “Congress shall make no law respecting…the right of the people peaceably…to petition the government FOR A REDRESS of grievances.” They know the only duty they have is to place the mandate I have invoked next to the law or authority I have challenged and rule whether the two square up. But they use sophistry to facilitate the ongoing oppression of this provision of the US Constitution to avail themselves to the ill-gotten fruits of this conspiracy.

In the end, I shall win. The people shall know!

THE SOPHISTRY OF THE DAY

Again I looked at the court docket and see the court filed my new challenge as an objection. An objection and a challenge that a law is made in violation of the commanded protection of the right of redress in the First Amendment are not the same thing. This is another way of oppressing a lawful challenge as presented in USA v Butler, 297 US 1, which states, “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. All legislation must conform to the principles it lays down. When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty, -to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former. All the court does, of can do, is to announce its considered judgment upon the question.”

                Judge Joseph R. McCrorey and Judge G. Ross Anderson, Jr. have repeatedly used this form of sophistry to obfuscate the challenge. Unless the people come together and demand that the Government HONOR their oath of office to defend the U.S. Constitution the courts will continue to conspire to oppress redress. Please demand that this challenge be answered. Go to  //wh.gov/JgyP and sign the petition.

The fifth mandate of the First Amendment is the command "Congress shall make no law respecting...the right of the people peaceably...to petition the government FOR A REDRESS of grievences."

All persons in government take the OATH commanded in Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution to defend the Constitution. This OATH is found at 5 usc-3331. Every person in government sware an oath in the name of GOD to defemd the Constitution from enemies, foreign and domestic.

+President Obama and +Judge Joseph R. McCorey both have cospired to use GOD'S name in vain to facilitate a conspiracy against GOD and the U.S. Constitution.

Do you feel they should HONOR their OATH to GOD and Country?

Sign the petition at //wh.gov/JgyP