Again I looked at the court docket and see the court filed my new challenge as an objection. An objection and a challenge that a law is made in violation of the commanded protection of the right of redress in the First Amendment are not the same thing. This is another way of oppressing a lawful challenge as presented in USA v Butler, 297 US 1, which states, “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. All legislation must conform to the principles it lays down. When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty, -to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former. All the court does, of can do, is to announce its considered judgment upon the question.”
Judge Joseph R. McCrorey and Judge G. Ross Anderson, Jr. have repeatedly used this form of sophistry to obfuscate the challenge. Unless the people come together and demand that the Government HONOR their oath of office to defend the U.S. Constitution the courts will continue to conspire to oppress redress. Please demand that this challenge be answered. Go to //wh.gov/JgyP and sign the petition.
No comments:
Post a Comment