Judge McCrorey conspires to oppress lawful challenge

                I just sent a copy of the Email I have been sending out today to Judge Joseph R. McCrorey at mccrorey_ecf@scd.uscourts.gov and to Judge George Ross Anderson, Jr at ganderson_ecf@scd.uscourts.gov   . As they have been complicit in oppressing this FIRST AMMENDMENT challenge as presented in USA v Butler, 297 us 1 from the beginning it is clear they do not care about their oath to GOD in 5 usc -3331 or their oath to defend the US Constitution. The Butler supra is clear.

“The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. All legislation must conform to the principles it lays down. When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty, -to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former. All the court does, of can do, is to announce its considered judgment upon the question.”

As judges they know Marbury v. Madison, 5 us 137.

“The oath of office, too, imposed by the legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words: “I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as, according to the best of my abilities and understanding agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States.”

Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United Stated, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?

If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery, To prescribe, of to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.

It is also not entirely unworthy of observation, that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the constitution, have that rank.

Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United Stated confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”

It is clear that Judge McCororey and Judge Anderson as well as all who have seen my challenge and turn a blind eye are complicit or enabling the facilitation of this conspiracy. The fifth mandate I invoked is unambiguous “Congress shall make no law respecting…the right of the people peaceably…to petition the government FOR A REDRESS of grievances.” They know the only duty they have is to place the mandate I have invoked next to the law or authority I have challenged and rule whether the two square up. But they use sophistry to facilitate the ongoing oppression of this provision of the US Constitution to avail themselves to the ill-gotten fruits of this conspiracy.

In the end, I shall win. The people shall know!