NIGER! DON'T DRINK THAT WATER!

                Thank GOD for the Right of Redress in the FIRST AMENDMENT that protected the Right of the People to challenge the EVIL of the Government’s right to make a Law that says one group of people was less than human. If it were not for the right of the people peaceably to petition the government for a redress of grievances and those brave enough to stand up to an evil law that said one group of people were not allowed to drink from the same place as a white man this evil might still exist.

                Last night I was trying to find someone to sign my petition to demand the court give redress to my challenge of Laws made in violation of the First Amendment command “Congress shall make NO LAW respecting…the right of the people peaceably…to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” A black man told me that I should let it go. That if the government makes a law, it the law and you have to obey it. If it had not been for the right of Redress and the brave people who stood up to the oppression of the equal rights of the oppressed then we would still have that evil today. The government has made laws that give the government the right to bear false witness against me and deny me the right to grieve it.

                President Bush made laws that make it unlawful to challenge the telecommunication companies from conspiring to violate the fourth Amendment with unlawful wire tapping, “FISA Amendments Act of 2008”.  President Clinton made the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that gave the court’s the power to oppress and deny the Privilege of Habeas Corpus, a constitutionally protected right. There is literally hundreds of Law made by Congress made in violation of First Amendment mandate I have invoked in my challenge.

The US Constitution is the Laws of the United States which shall be make in Pursuance thereof, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land: and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby.

                Every judge takes two oaths, and to defend the integrity of the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic;…that ends “So help me God.”  They bind their soul and their HONOR to their oath to defend the integrity of the Constitution.

                The fifth mandate of the FIRST AMENDMENT is a command that is clear and unambiguous.

“Congress shall make no law respecting…the right of the people peaceably…to petition the government FOR A RESRESS of grievances.”

                I have repeatedly made a Lawful challenge of several laws used to oppress the grievance process under USA v. Butler, 297 us 1 which states,                                                                                                “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. All legislation must conform to the principles it lays down. When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty, -to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former. All the court does, of can do, is to announce its considered judgment upon the question.”

As judges they know Marbury v. Madison, 5 us 137.

“The oath of office, too, imposed by the legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words: “I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as, according to the best of my abilities and understanding agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States.”

Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United Stated, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?

If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery, To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.

It is also not entirely unworthy of observation, that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the constitution, have that rank.

Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United Stated confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”

I repeatedly challenge Laws that are repugnant of this First Amendment mandate only to have them and all persons in government refuse to HONOR their oath to defend the integrity of the Constitution. Judge Joseph R. McCorey, Email: mccrorey_ecf@scd.uscourts.gov and George Ross Anderson, Jr, Email: ganderson_ecf@scf@scd.uscourts.gov both refuse to HONOR their oath and give redress to this challenge. They would rather conspire against GOD and Country to facilitate the ongoing oppression of the Constitution than give a Full and Fair Redress on the record as their duty would require.

I have made this challenge over and over. The courts have repeatedly called this challenge an objection or use other forms of sophistry to obfuscate the challenge. Butler is clear that the court has only one duty. To lay the FIRST AMENDMENT mandate I have invoked above next to the FISA Amendment Act, the FTCA, the AEDPA, and all other laws made by congress respecting the right of the people to peaceably to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This challenge will VOID all laws made by Congress to oppress redress. Please help me compel the courts to answer this challenge. I welcome all adversaries of the U.S. Constitution to challenge this argument. I need all those who believe in the integrity of the Constitution to help me. We can restore this right!

 Please sign my petition:"The oppression of the RIGHT OF REDRESS in the FIRST AMENDMENT: A Full and Fair Redress on the record of challenge of Laws " on Change.org.

It's important. Will you sign it too? Here's the link:http://www.change.org/petitions/the-oppession-of-the-right-of-redress-in-the-first-amendment-a-full-and-fair-redress-on-the-record-of-challenge-of-laws?share_id=aGeIHISkma&utm_campaign=signature_receipt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition

I welcome all comments of those who believe that government should have the right to oppress the rights of the people and the people should have the right for a full and fair redress on the record.